<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Nerdy Dork</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nerdydork.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nerdydork.com</link>
	<description>Dustin Davis reviews... the internet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:42:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Webfaction Review by Julien Desrosiers</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdydork.com/webfaction-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-6717</link>
		<dc:creator>Julien Desrosiers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdydork.com/webfaction-review.html#comment-6717</guid>
		<description>&quot;Webfaction has a method of breaking things down by domains, applications, and websites. Once you understand how it works, you will fall in love with the simplicity of the system!&quot; 
Cannot agree more. This kind of thing is rare on other webhosts that try to be user-friendly.

i love Webfaction. It&#039;s so easy to host anything that is cool like Django or RoR. I hope that more webhosts will become like WebFaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Webfaction has a method of breaking things down by domains, applications, and websites. Once you understand how it works, you will fall in love with the simplicity of the system!&#8221;<br />
Cannot agree more. This kind of thing is rare on other webhosts that try to be user-friendly.</p>
<p>i love Webfaction. It&#8217;s so easy to host anything that is cool like Django or RoR. I hope that more webhosts will become like WebFaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Webfaction Review by Auto Content Cash Review</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdydork.com/webfaction-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-6713</link>
		<dc:creator>Auto Content Cash Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 21:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdydork.com/webfaction-review.html#comment-6713</guid>
		<description>Ive just been taking a closer look at Webfaction - they seem great value for just $5.50/month. Im currently using Host Monster and Host Gator - both work find but I really like the sound of Webfaction - I&#039;ll definitely give it a go next time I need to add another host...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive just been taking a closer look at Webfaction &#8211; they seem great value for just $5.50/month. Im currently using Host Monster and Host Gator &#8211; both work find but I really like the sound of Webfaction &#8211; I&#8217;ll definitely give it a go next time I need to add another host&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mobile App on Subdomain with Django by Dustin</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdydork.com/mobile-app-on-subdomain-with-django.html/comment-page-1#comment-6710</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdydork.com/?p=639#comment-6710</guid>
		<description>@Henrique: I didn&#039;t want to mess with a middleware solution (I actually wrote sub-domain middleware that is posted in djangosnippets) mainly because I didn&#039;t want to mess with setting up hosts in my test environment. I prefer to call the run server command for testing because on any given day I could be working on my app on a Ubuntu box, my Macbook Pro, or my Windows 7 box. I&#039;m just too lazy to set up such a development environment in each.

@dryan: There are various options documented on the Internet on how to serve up the same views but modified for a mobile platform, but as I mentioned in the post, my mobile app is a different (dumbed down) app altogether. I didn&#039;t want to use any of my views or templates from the original site, although this solution leaves to door open to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Henrique: I didn&#8217;t want to mess with a middleware solution (I actually wrote sub-domain middleware that is posted in djangosnippets) mainly because I didn&#8217;t want to mess with setting up hosts in my test environment. I prefer to call the run server command for testing because on any given day I could be working on my app on a Ubuntu box, my Macbook Pro, or my Windows 7 box. I&#8217;m just too lazy to set up such a development environment in each.</p>
<p>@dryan: There are various options documented on the Internet on how to serve up the same views but modified for a mobile platform, but as I mentioned in the post, my mobile app is a different (dumbed down) app altogether. I didn&#8217;t want to use any of my views or templates from the original site, although this solution leaves to door open to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One Click Django Project Publishing by Craig @ Instant Money Code Bonus</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdydork.com/one-click-django-project-publishing.html/comment-page-1#comment-6708</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig @ Instant Money Code Bonus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdydork.com/one-click-django-project-publishing.html#comment-6708</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read that Django was designed to be used in a newsroom situation...supposedly it is good for building applications although the very idea of doing so scares the heck out of me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read that Django was designed to be used in a newsroom situation&#8230;supposedly it is good for building applications although the very idea of doing so scares the heck out of me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mobile App on Subdomain with Django by dryan</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdydork.com/mobile-app-on-subdomain-with-django.html/comment-page-1#comment-6706</link>
		<dc:creator>dryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdydork.com/?p=639#comment-6706</guid>
		<description>On chattarati.com I use a context processor to detect if the request is on the m. subdomain or not then set a base_template variable accordingly. All my templates {% extends base_template %}. In addition, it sets an is_mobile variable that I use inside the templates for any conditional differences I want to make (for instance we serve different css and resize images to a smaller dimension).

When a mobile visitor hits the site they are presented with a link at the top of the page to view this page on a mobile optimized version. If they click that, once at m. they are presented with another link letting them set a preference (via cookie) to always view the site in the mobile version. This way if they click a link on Twitter, etc. they get automatically redirected by a middleware class.

Not knowing your particular app, I don&#039;t know why you want to present a different URL structure, but I would say to make sure that if a user manually types in a URL that it&#039;s properly redirected. About two thirds of the links I click on Twitter on my phone take me to a site that redirects me to a mobile version but not to the article I was trying to get to because the URL structures don&#039;t match. Finally, the UX guy in me has to mention to give your users a link to switch out of the mobile version. It should be their option to choose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <a href="http://chattarati.com" title="http://chattarati.com" target="_blank">chattarati.com</a> I use a context processor to detect if the request is on the m. subdomain or not then set a base_template variable accordingly. All my templates {% extends base_template %}. In addition, it sets an is_mobile variable that I use inside the templates for any conditional differences I want to make (for instance we serve different css and resize images to a smaller dimension).</p>
<p>When a mobile visitor hits the site they are presented with a link at the top of the page to view this page on a mobile optimized version. If they click that, once at m. they are presented with another link letting them set a preference (via cookie) to always view the site in the mobile version. This way if they click a link on Twitter, etc. they get automatically redirected by a middleware class.</p>
<p>Not knowing your particular app, I don&#8217;t know why you want to present a different URL structure, but I would say to make sure that if a user manually types in a URL that it&#8217;s properly redirected. About two thirds of the links I click on Twitter on my phone take me to a site that redirects me to a mobile version but not to the article I was trying to get to because the URL structures don&#8217;t match. Finally, the UX guy in me has to mention to give your users a link to switch out of the mobile version. It should be their option to choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One Click Django Project Publishing by tzangms</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdydork.com/one-click-django-project-publishing.html/comment-page-1#comment-6704</link>
		<dc:creator>tzangms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdydork.com/one-click-django-project-publishing.html#comment-6704</guid>
		<description>Try fabric, you can do more things easily with fabric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try fabric, you can do more things easily with fabric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mobile App on Subdomain with Django by Henrique</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdydork.com/mobile-app-on-subdomain-with-django.html/comment-page-1#comment-6703</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdydork.com/?p=639#comment-6703</guid>
		<description>You can just serve your Django project right at the root domain, and have a Middleware check the subdomain the client used. If it&#039;s www or whatever, you keep going. If it&#039;s, let&#039;s say, &quot;mobile&quot;, you can have your apps use a different set of templates, or redirect request to a different set of views intended for mobile version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can just serve your Django project right at the root domain, and have a Middleware check the subdomain the client used. If it&#8217;s www or whatever, you keep going. If it&#8217;s, let&#8217;s say, &#8220;mobile&#8221;, you can have your apps use a different set of templates, or redirect request to a different set of views intended for mobile version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 Releases October 22nd 2009 by andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdydork.com/windows-7-releases-october-22nd-2009.html/comment-page-1#comment-6702</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 01:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdydork.com/windows-7-releases-october-22nd-2009.html#comment-6702</guid>
		<description>Im using it right now &amp; simply love the new appearance provided by it..I&#039;ve never used vista before but so far that i heard, win7 is less resource-hogging..better than vista

although too bad, there are some old programs that i cant install on this new windows</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im using it right now &amp; simply love the new appearance provided by it..I&#8217;ve never used vista before but so far that i heard, win7 is less resource-hogging..better than vista</p>
<p>although too bad, there are some old programs that i cant install on this new windows</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mobile App on Subdomain with Django by Dustin</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdydork.com/mobile-app-on-subdomain-with-django.html/comment-page-1#comment-6701</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdydork.com/?p=639#comment-6701</guid>
		<description>@Julian: I&#039;ve posted my mobile_settings.py file for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Julian: I&#8217;ve posted my mobile_settings.py file for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mobile App on Subdomain with Django by Julian Pulgarin</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdydork.com/mobile-app-on-subdomain-with-django.html/comment-page-1#comment-6700</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Pulgarin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdydork.com/?p=639#comment-6700</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be interested in what the mobile version of settings.py ends up looking like - please post it when you&#039;re done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested in what the mobile version of settings.py ends up looking like &#8211; please post it when you&#8217;re done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
